(CNN)The guilty verdict against Roger Stone, a longtime adviser to President Donald Trump, is a devastating turn of events perhaps the final chapter in the storied life of a political trickster. It’s also a cautionary tale about the dark corners of democracy, where the limits of law and morality are frequently tested, traded, and violated.

That “crossed the line” boast vanished this week, when a jury found him guilty on seven counts of witness tampering, making false statements and lying to Congress at a fateful 2017 hearing about his connection to Wikileaks during the 2016 campaign.

    Who is Roger Stone?

Stone had publicly claimed to have a back channel to Julian Assange and the shadowy Wikileaks operation, and to know in advance about stolen emails that were released at key moments in the 2016 campaign, timed to help Trump by inflicting maximum harm on Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee.

    Stone’s connection was (he claimed in classic Roger Stone style) a slightly shady but perfectly legal arrangement. Special counsel Robert Mueller thought otherwise and indicted Stone for lying about the nature of those connections.

    The jury agreed. The Wikileaks caper turned out to be one dirty trick too many.

    Stone gleefully cultivated the image of, as he once put it, “a libertarian and a libertine,” the kind of man prepared to take on sketchy assignments that other operatives would shun as too risky or immoral. He drove expensive Jaguar sedans, dressed impeccably in custom-tailored Saville Row suits, frequented sex clubs and got bounced from the 1996 presidential campaign of Bob Dole when the National Enquirer published an ad seeking group sex partners to join him and his wife in a liaison.

      Why Mueller cares about Roger Stone

    I frequently interviewed Stone about political strategy, Florida politics, the reasons for Trump’s rise and men’s fashion (about which he happens to be brilliant). He was an undeniably colorful character in the political circus and might yet emerge from what is the biggest setback in his life.

    Trump-haters might imagine that Stone, facing up to 20 years in prison, might be in a prime position to share damning information about the President. That’s wishful thinking.

      The problem that sank Stone at trial was his many years of posturing as the bad boy who would twist the truth and break the rules whenever necessary. Having established a reputation for shadiness, it became difficult for Stone to convince a jury that he was, for once, completely on the level.

      That same issue will come up if prosecutors try to flip Stone and get him to reveal anything damaging about Trump. Who would believe him?

      Source: http://edition.cnn.com/


      Recommended For You

      Like it? Share with your friends!


      Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

      This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.